Article 1664

RA 386 · Civil Code of the Philippines

ELI5— what this means for you

The landlord is not obliged to answer for a mere act of trespass which a third person may cause on the use of the thing leased; but the tenant shall have a direct action against the intruder.

Official text — RA 386

The lessor is not obliged to answer for a mere act of trespass which a third person may cause on the use of the thing leased; but the lessee shall have a direct action against the intruder.

There is a mere act of trespass when the third person claims no right whatever. (1560a)

Source: lawphil.net (RA 386 as amended)

← Article 1663 All articles Article 1665 →

Civil Code — All Articles →Family Code of the Philippines →Labor Code of the Philippines →All Philippine Laws →

RELATED RIGHTS

Civil Law

Article 1 — Civil Code

Civil Law

Article 2 — Unpublished laws cannot be enforced against citizens.

Legal disclaimer: BatasKo provides general legal information, not legal advice. For advice on contracts, property rights, obligations, or civil damages, consult a licensed Filipino lawyer or the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) at pao.gov.ph.

Related